Thirty years ago a small and rare tropical plant was put into these tanks to grow.
What came out was a monster.
Today it is a potential threat to seas and oceans across the world.
You could just tell as you came up to it there was trouble.
It has a real insidious sort of creepy nature as if it's some sort of blob that's taking over at the bottom.
Nobody knows where it may strike next.
I don't believe that it's an exaggeration to say that this challenge is my worst nightmare
and to the degree that people understand, it's their worst nightmare.
This is the extraordinary story of how an insignificant algae
grew to become something many scientists believe is capable of causing ecological damage across the globe.
It's become known as the killer algae.
It's like out of a horror movie, but it's real.
Along the Pacific coast of southern California lie some of America's most popular holiday beaches.
Thousands of people come here every year to ride the waves.
Just behind the beaches are a series of lagoons, famous for water sports.
It was here nine months ago that a team of divers found something totally unexpected on the seabed.
It was a small plant they'd never seen before.
They decided to find out what it was.
I spent several days looking it up doing some research on it and when I finally found a photo
as the picture downloaded onto my computer there was just a sinking feeling in my stomach.
What marine biologist Rachael Woodfield had seen sent her rushing back to the lagoon.
As she dived she was aware that if her suspicions were correct California faced a major problem.
At first glance it looks like it's a nice round patch,
but the more you investigate you see that deep down inside the eel grass there are many fingers of it
spreading out into the eel grass sort of just creeping its way along the bottom.
The American biologists knew that the plant had an awesome reputation for taking over and destroying whole ecosystems.
We're assuming the worst case scenario that if we don't control it it's going to completely overtake this lagoon
and if we're wrong I'd rather be wrong, over-estimating the impact than under-estimating it.
The lagoon is directly linked to the sea. Their biggest fear was that it would escape into the Pacific
and take over the entire Californian coast.
A large area of the lagoon was cordoned off by the police,
but no one knew how to destroy the plant, or stop it spreading.
It had turned into California's biggest marine pollution scare for decades,
yet this whole dramatic situation might have been avoided.
In the early 1990s a European biologist had predicted just such a problem,
but nobody at the time had listened to him.
It all began twelve years ago, thousands of miles away, in Monaco.
Here one day, French marine biologist Alexandre Meinesz went diving in the Mediterranean.
Meinesz is an expert on the marine life of the Mediterranean.
He knew that among the dozens of plants that live in it
there is one key plant that is fundamental to the sea's ecosystem.
It normally covers large areas of the seabed.
It's a dark, grey/green sea grass called possidonia.
Possidonia is a plant which provides food and shelter for a huge variety of fish and invertebrates,
but that day as Alexandre Meinesz dived, nothing was as he expected it to be.
The water was very clear. The sun was shining and the visibility was good.
Then I saw straightaway that the seabed was bright green.
I said to myself this isn't possible, there shouldn't be any brilliant green seaweed here.
Where Meinesz had expected to find the usual variety of Mediterranean sea life
all he could see for hundreds of metres
was a dense and bright green mat of weed he'd never seen before.
As he studied the extraordinary new plant he realised it was a giant variant of a tropical algae
called caulerpa taxifolia yet how could a tropical plant survive in the colder waters of the Mediterranean?
He decided to try and find out what was going on.
Back in the laboratory he compared the taxifolia with other specimens of the same family of algae from around the world.
: I have a few specimens that I collected myself several decades ago in the Red Sea
and here is Tahiti in Polynesia. They are all small, whatever depth they come from
not very long, not very wide and the runners are always very thin,
so I realised straightaway that what was growing in the Mediterranean
was something absolutely exceptional, that had never been seen before.
This new plant was bigger, tougher and more vigorous than any other specimen of caulerpa
and it normally lived thousands of miles away in the Tropics.
It's a giant in comparison with what can be found in tropical seas.
I realised that it was different from anything else in the world. I was absolutely astonished.
It was something strange. I did some more research but everything confirmed my first impression.
It was an alien. Something abnormal, supernatural, was beginning to develop in the Mediterranean.
It was growing so fast and densely it was swamping the dark green native possidonia.
There was something else too.
The coastal waters of the Mediterranean are normally home to some 600 species of animals and plants,
yet the seabed around the mysterious new algae was almost devoid of other marine life.
I immediately felt that the whole Mediterranean was in danger.
This was a very adaptable plant. It seemed able to alter the ecology of large areas of the sea.
It seemed like something out of science fiction.
What was a gigantic tropical algae doing flourishing in the Mediterranean?
Charles-Francois Boudouresque is one of France's leading experts on Mediterranean animal life.
Alexandre Meinesz telephoned me several times to say he'd made an incredible discovery.
He asked me to come to Nice to see it.
I said yes, yes, but later.
It took him a year to persuade me to come and see the colonies of caulerpa taxifolia.
When he saw it Boudouresque was also shocked by the invasion.
He immediately agreed to investigate whether the algae was harming the sea's animal life.
The animal he chose as a test case was the sea urchin
which lives on plants and is easy to observe in the laboratory.
He set up a simple experiment.
Here is an urchin that has been fed on native Mediterranean algae.
The mouth normally faces downwards and we turn it over.
We put it with its mouth facing upwards.
We know that a sea urchin that is in good health takes about one minute to turn back over again,
to return to its natural position.
Almost immediately the urchin began to put out little suckers, wave its spines and struggle to turn itself over.
In less than a minute it had completed the manoeuvre.
There, what an athlete. It's a very good athlete.
In another jar Boudouresque had urchins fed exclusively on the new algae.
These urchins have been fed for a long time on caulerpa taxifolia.
We do the same experiment with them. We turn them over and measure the time they take to right themselves.
The time they took to turn over crept up from two minutes, to five, to twenty.
Boudouresque suspected the urchins were finding the taxifolia inedible and were starving to death.
After a month on an exclusive diet of taxifolia the turning over time had reached 30 minutes.
It soon became clear that some even preferred to die rather than eat the algae.
The findings were very disturbing. If the new algae took over the Mediterranean
would other animals which feed on plants react in the same way? Would the whole food chain be disrupted?
What, the French researchers wondered, was the plant's secret weapon that stopped the urchins eating it?
Meinesz sent samples to a number of European labs specialising in plant toxins.
At the Max Planck Institute in Germany they began analysing the chemical composition of the caulerpa samples.
The findings were unexpected.
Many plants employ a chemical defence mechanism to ward off predators,
but most use a variety of different toxins in relatively small quantities.
The mysterious new algae turned out to be different.
It is very special because caulerpa taxifolia is nearly entirely relying on one component,
that it is basing its whole chemical defence on. Usually plants use a multitude of different components
that have all different target animals.
Caulerpa taxifolia uses another strategy. It uses only one component,
but this component is produced in a very high amount.
It was the sheer concentration of the toxin in the plant that marked it out as something very unusual.
The toxin is called caulerpenine and the concentration was higher than in any other algae Pohnert had ever analysed.
Pohnert discovered that although the toxin was not lethal to humans or animals,
it made the plant almost totally inedible and if nothing would eat it there was nothing to stop the algae's advance.
If it took over, the Mediterranean's animal life would be forced to flee or starve to death.
Alexandre Meinesz now believed he was dealing with not just any invasive plant,
but an exceptionally harmful and vigorous organism.
As the algae continued to spread, growing at twice the speed of indigenous plants,
he worried that the situation could rapidly get out of control unless something was done to stop it.
There was one hope.
The colony of algae lay directly under the walls of one of Europe's most prestigious marine research
and conservation organisations: the Monaco Oceanographic Museum.
Meinesz felt sure the Museum would help him.
It would take money, resources and government involvement,
but Meinesz was confident the Museum would be able to persuade the French authorities
to eradicate the algae before it spread further.
He was in for a shock.
The Museum is run by Professor Francois Doumenge, one of France's most influential marine biologists.
He is Director of an institution which, for nearly a century, has championed oceanographic conservation
and preserved the riches of the sea in a series of palatial galleries.
Meinesz approached the Museum with his concerns, but the Museum's Director had a very different view of the situation.
He simply didn't believe the invasion of caulerpa taxifolia was dangerous or unnatural.
The development of tropical species in the Mediterranean is an old story.
Some species date back to the opening of the Suez Canal and are now well known.
So there have been tropical species in the Mediterranean since the end of the 19th century.
Doumenge argued that algae like taxifolia are constantly moved around the world by sea currents
and frequently lie dormant in the water for years until a temperature change brings them to life.
Doumenge suggested Meinesz was worrying about nothing. The growth of the taxifolia was not a danger,
merely a sign of the evolving character of the Mediterranean Sea.
Eight to ten thousand years ago
the sea was 120 metres lower than it is now and three to five degrees cooler,
so the Mediterranean should be seen as a basin which changes very rapidly on the geological timescale.
Its current state is simply an intermediate state, a transitory phase.
Doumenge passed on his thoughts to the French Ministry of the Environment who breathed a sigh of relief.
If the algae was not dangerous but part of a pattern of global change
there was not much the French government could be expected to do against such a fundamental, natural occurrence.
Over the next 18 months the algae spread, as Meinesz had feared it might.
In 1990 there were sightings at Cap Martin, four kilometres east of Monaco,
and at Toulon, almost 200 kilometres in the opposite direction.
By late 1991 there were some dozen patches of the algae dotted along the French Riviera.
It confirmed all my fears. The algae was beginning to spread.
I could no longer keep quiet. I absolutely had to tell the media to try to make the people aware of it.
By the early 1990s, with the press finally involved, the French Ministry of the Environment stepped in.
It sent a research ship to the affected area of the Mediterranean to see what was going on.
At long last there was official recognition that something might be wrong.
The man in charge of the government's research effort was marine biologist Thomas Belsher.
Belcher sent down divers to chart the taxifolia beds.
The progress of caulerpa taxifolia can be followed by an underwater video camera
which is a few metres above the seabed
and each time we see some caulerpa we mark it.
This allows us to make accurate maps of the observations.
Almost immediately Belsher found that Meinesz, if anything, had underestimated the size of the infestation
and the rate it was growing.
Belsher's divers investigated further. It was, as Meinesz had already observed,
bigger, faster growing and denser than any algae ever seen before.
Belsher's maps revealed that the Mediterranean seabed
was being transformed faster than at any time in recent history.
We had never seen an alga introduced into a marine ecosystem that had grown so quickly.
The seriousness of the situation was reinforced by other researchers
who now established that fish populations around the invasive taxifolia beds were measurably falling.
In some places fish numbers had dropped by up to 50%.
Fish, like urchins, appeared to find the taxifolia too toxic to eat.
The French authorities, still only half convinced this was a problem they could do anything about,
commissioned a series of small-scale experimental eradictions.
It soon became clear that destroying the plant was going to be much more difficult than anybody had expected.
Divers were sent down to dig up patches of algae by hand,
but it was like trying to trim a football pitch with a pair of scissors.
This algae is very difficult to eradicate.
You can see that the roots are as fine as hair and have fruits that may give rise to new plants,
so to eliminate it by hand
you have to remove much more than what you see. You have to remove everything underneath as well
- the mud, the sand - because there might be little bits not visible to the eye.
They tried freezing it to death with blocks of dry ice. It was never a match for the scale of the problem.
They even tried sucking it up with an underwater vacuum cleaner.
The trials quickly showed that it would take an army of divers many years to make an impact on the algae.
By 1994 new sightings showed that the taxifolia had spread even further,
yet there was something very puzzling about the way it was spreading.
It was not just expanding into the neighbouring seabed, it was leaping from one bit of coast to another,
establishing new colonies hundreds of miles apart.
Meinesz knew that if the authorities were to slow its spread
they needed to understand what lay behind this apparently erratic pattern of growth
but there were those who still believed he was worrying about nothing.
The Director of the Monaco Museum, Francois Doumenge, continued to suggest Meinesz was over-reacting.
In my opinion if we'd taken time to consider the problem, if we'd tackled it with greater scientific calmness
and not incidentally concluded that it was a catastrophe, we'd have realised there was not much to worry about.
Meinesz went back to the lab. He suspected the key to understanding the plant's erratic spread
lay in knowing how it reproduced.
What we wanted to know right at the start is how this species reproduces.
You have to take a little bit of juice that is in this caulerpa, put it on the slide and look at it under a microscope.
The sticky juice of the taxifolia contains microscopic particles called gametes or reproductive cells.
These are normally male and female and act like sperm and egg.
Theoretically you should find two types of gametes, reproductive organs inside the juice.
The gametes are very small. They measure five microns. The male gamete is the same size as the female gamete,
but there is a small difference - the female gamete has a red dot, a stigma.
Meinesz studied slides of the juice of the taxifolia looking for the red dot that identifies the female gamete.
He couldn't find a single female gamete.
We looked in vain for female gametes on the specimens from the Mediterranean.
There were no female gametes, so no fusion between the two gametes, no sexual reproduction.
There could be only one explanation.
The taxifolia in the Mediterranean was spreading not through sexual reproduction,
but by a process known as vegetative reproduction. It's a form of cloning.
It was an important breakthrough that finally made sense of the strange spread of the taxifolia.
It meant that any tiny fragment of the algae separated from the main plant
contained all the genetic material necessary to grow an exact replica of the parent plant
to create a clone.
It's as if a piece of human hair, or a flake of skin dropped on the ground could grow into a complete human being.
Meinesz now realised that it would only take an infinitesimally small fragment of the taxifolia
picked up by the anchor of one of the thousands of boats that criss-cross the sea
to start a new colony of plants hundreds of miles away.
By 1997 a new map of the colonies of the algae seemed to confirm this hypothesis.
it had jumped further along the coasts of France and Italy,
it had even leapt across to the coast of Croatia. It was eight years since Meinesz had first raised the alarm.
Now nowhere in the Mediterranean seemed safe.
But even as the new figures were being assimilated
there was a dramatic discovery which was to throw new light on the algae's origins
and confirm Meinesz's fears that there was something very unnatural about the plant.
It happened here at the University of Geneva.
Olivier Jousson is a specialist in DNA sampling.
He realised the only way to prove whether the gigantic taxifolia in the Mediterranean was a natural invasion
was to trace its origins. If he could match its DNA to the DNA of any tropical taxifolia
then the theory of the Monaco Museum that it had naturally drifted in from the Tropics was probably right.
I realised that the main problem with caulerpa was that nobody knew where it had come from.
He set about processing dozens of samples of taxifolia from all over the world,
including the Red Sea and areas of the Pacific. Nothing matched.
Each time the DNA fingerprint was slightly different from the Mediterranean strain.
It was a mystery.
Eventually there was only one strain left to try.
It was a perfect match,
but this was not a wild plant; it had been bred by humans.
It was a sample of caulerpa taxifolia taken from an aquarium tank.
For years a very peculiar strain of caulerpa taxifolia has been used to decorate tropical fish tanks.
It appeared that it was this human bred, artificial strain which had escaped into the Mediterranean.
Jousson's discovery proved, beyond reasonable doubt,
that the taxifolia in the Mediterranean had not drifted in from the Tropics.
Monaco's argument that what was happening was part of a natural cycle of change in the sea did not hold up.
It wasn't long before people also realised that if the findings were right the most obvious source of the alien invasion
was the one place that was certain it had come from elsewhere:
the Monaco Oceanographic Museum.
The Museum was known to have had taxifolia in its tropical tanks
and was also directly above the site of the first known infestation.
Yet to suggest that the Museum was, albeit unwittingly, responsible
carried huge political and scientific implications.
It meant the Institute had somehow unknowingly allowed material from its aquarium tanks to get into the sea.
Worse, the most likely time for all this to have happened was in the early 1980s
when the Museum had been run by a man with an international reputation for marine research:
Jacques Cousteau.
For years he'd been the father of French marine biology, a hero of marine conservation.
The irony was that to accuse the Monaco Museum of even accidentally releasing a rogue alga into the sea
was to hold some of the most famous names in marine conservation responsible for what many now regarded
as an ecological disaster.
The Museum flatly denied any link between the taxifolia in its tanks
and the taxifolia below its walls and questioned the validity of the DNA findings.
I think that the tests that were performed didn't use either the safest or best known methods.
What we need for an accurate answer is much more detailed, much finer genetic studies,
using a much bigger range of samples than was practical before.
Doumenge's was a controversial point of view. Even Jacques Cousteau, when he later found out about the issue,
told the French Minister of Environment that there might be cause for concern,
but with so much taxifolia in the sea the exact source of the original infestation had become less important.
Scientists now realised that wherever the aquarium breed had come from they were dealing with an extremely invasive plant.
It was also remarkably adaptable.
In the aquaria it had developed a new and distinctive DNA fingerprint
and changed its characteristic so it could survive in cooler water.
I ask myself a question that in my opinion was really incomprehensible:
how can this algae, which only lives in the Tropics where it's always 20 degrees,
withstand winters when it's 13 degrees?
How could it stay alive?
A search for an answer lay in tracing the aquarium plant to its original source.
The trail led back from Monaco, through France, to Germany and a zoo in Stuttgart.
Here, during the 1970s, aquarium staff at the Wilhelmina Zoo had made a curious discovery.
At the time people everywhere had been trying to find a plant that could be used to decorate tropical fish tanks.
The world's leading aquaria imported wild specimens from the four corners of the globe,
but nothing seemed to survive in the artificial environment of a tank,
but then at the Wilhelmina Zoo, something unexpected happened.
A newly imported strain of wild caulerpa taxifolia from the Pacific suddenly blossomed and flourished.
It rapidly turned into the Zoo's wonder plant.
At the time nobody asked how, or why, it had suddenly flourished. Now they did.
The question of the nature of this algae gave me a lot of food for thought and there are only two hypothesis.
First hypothesis: someone selects a bunch of caulerpa in the wild
which is slightly abnormal, more resistant to the cold,
and it is this one that is grown in an aquarium and find its way into the Mediterranean.
In other words, a collector in the 1970s had, by accident,
selected an unusually big and robust sample of the plant in the wild
and it was this exceptional plant which had been grown in the Stuttgart Zoo,
but there was also a second possibility.
The second hypothesis: something happens in the aquarium to modify the plants.
For some reason there is a change in its genetic structure, a mutation, a change in the chromosomes.
It could be one of several things.
Aquarium tanks use chemicals and lights to artificially recreate the natural balance of the sea.
Could this man-made brew have caused the original wild strain to change,
or mutate, into a more invasive plant than its wild cousin?
To this day nobody has ever solved the mystery.
The discovery was anyway rapidly overtaken by a new concern.
Throughout the 80s and 90s the German-bred algae had been sent to aquaria around the world.
It had become the most popular aquatic plant on earth. It was everywhere.
If it could escape from one tank and survive, it could escape from others,
and if it could flourish in the Mediterranean it could flourish in dozens of other seas.
The super algae that Alexandre Meinesz had warned France about twelve years before
was now potentially a world problem.
California, with a huge trade in exotic plants, was always a likely victim.
Ironically after the genetic discoveries in Europe, the US Department of Agriculture had listed caulerpa taxifolia
as a noxious weed and banned sales and imports,
but the country's aquaria already housed huge quantities of it.
It was only a matter of time before some of it escaped into the wild.
Last year this is just what happened.
Caulerpa taxifolia was found in a coastal lagoon in southern California.
Could have been simply a case of where the individual was cleaning his aquarium in his front yard, in his
, in, in the street and as, and he had the algae in the aquarium and, and pieces of it floated down the gutter,
got into the storm drain and then were just discharged into the lagoon because there is a, there is a,
a storm drain outlet right here, very close to where the infestation is.
The Americans, determined to avoid the Mediterranean experience, knew they had to act fast.
Within weeks they'd settled on a radical campaign of eradication.
The chosen weapon was chlorine which kills everything in its path.
The chlorine is pumped down through a pipe from tanks on the surface
into a tarpaulin which has been spread over the algae and held down at the sides with pegs and sandbags.
Everything under the tarpaulin is killed - plants, fish, crustaceans.
It's a price the Americans are willing to pay.
No matter what level, how harsh the chemical response is, if we're effective
it's hard to believe that that could be as bad as not being effective and having a whole coastline smothered by this algae.
The chlorine, with an approximate strength of household bleach,
acts almost immediately. Within hours the taxifolia is dead.
It's an extreme solution, but it seems to be working in California.
In Europe, however, after 15 years the infestation of taxifolia has spread too far.
Poison is simply impractical and the scale of the destruction of wildlife would be completely unacceptable.
Here an even more radical solution is now being considered.
It's more controversial than poison, it's more drastic than most people will accept.
It's a tiny tropical slug, the only known creature in the world that kills taxifolia as it eats it.
At the University of Nice, Meinesz stumbled on it by accident.
I heard from an American Professor in Florida who told me there was a slug that fed exclusively on caulerpa.
To begin with I didn't take him very seriously. I couldn't believe that these little slugs could make much difference
to the enormous amount of caulerpa we've got here.
Then, by accident, we imported some of them in a bunch of caulerpa from the Caribbean,
so we began studying them and looking at their potential as a biological weapon
against caulerpa taxifolia and we have a few hopes.
The slug is unique in producing an enzyme which enables it to eat the plant and neutralise the toxin.
What is extraordinary is the way these slugs eat the caulerpa.
They don't chew it as we eat salad. They make a small hole and suck out the juice.
It's like a vampire sucking out the juice and leaving a dying husk.
By the time the slug has finished its meal the plant is dead and the toxin has been neutralised.
Meinesz's plan is to release thousands of these tropical slugs into the sea to attack the taxifolia beds,
but it's not nearly as straightforward as it sounds.
The French authorities are understandably wary of introducing yet another alien species into the Mediterranean
and have so far refused permission to test the slugs in open water,
yet Meinesz is sure the slug has evolved such a specialised and exclusive dependence on taxifolia
it won't attack anything else.
All the studies we've done tell us that there would be no danger if these little slugs were released into the Mediterranean.
It could be that this small creature is all that separates the Mediterranean from massive environmental damage,
yet it would be the ultimate irony if the sea were saved from caulerpa taxifolia
only to be decimated in turn by a tiny slug called elysia subornata.